In recent years, the integrated graphics silicon on Intel's consumer processors has improved greatly, but it still hasn't caught up with the graphics capabilities on AMD's parallel chips in the same price ranges. The first is that the AMD parts have held a strong lead in integrated-graphics performance. Integrated graphics performance lags far behind that of similarly priced AMD chips.įor a few years now, AMD's budget-friendly A-Series chips-combined CPUs and graphics processors, which the company dubs "accelerated processing units," or APUs-had a two-fold advantage over Intel's lower-end Core CPUs.How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |